When your team relies entirely on AI for simple questions and decisions, you're trading critical thinking for convenience. Here's why human judgment still matters more than you think.
“If you put bad or poor inputs it gets you bad or poor outputs”
This is something that echoes my mind every time “hallucinations” is mentioned about AI. We need to refocus our work in “prompt/context engineering” to get the best out of AI.
But your post highlights something so important, the training! It will shape the output to not make look bad an idea, question or person.
So I guess this will change when we break our uses to agents instead of the model directly.
AI is a sharp intern, not the boss. One thing that works great is to run a 10-min pre-mortem where you cite sources, write the counter-case, set the rollback, and name one owner.
My ChatGPT usage decreased A LOT since GPT5 launch. Great post mapping out hallucination.
GPT5 is much much better!
“If you put bad or poor inputs it gets you bad or poor outputs”
This is something that echoes my mind every time “hallucinations” is mentioned about AI. We need to refocus our work in “prompt/context engineering” to get the best out of AI.
But your post highlights something so important, the training! It will shape the output to not make look bad an idea, question or person.
So I guess this will change when we break our uses to agents instead of the model directly.
Elena, excellent post! And thanks for the mention :)
Thanks, Joel!
Honored to be on this list, thank you!
Thanks to you, keep going! 🚀
Fair points, AI is ultimately tue most heterogeneous thing ever 🙏🏻
Facts! 💯
AI is a sharp intern, not the boss. One thing that works great is to run a 10-min pre-mortem where you cite sources, write the counter-case, set the rollback, and name one owner.
I love this advice! Thanks for sharing it!